Array
(
[id] => 928
[catid] => 29
[title] => Postoperative pain management in non-traumatic emergency general surgery: WSES-GAIS-SIAARTI-AAST guidelines
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/928.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:18
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:18
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2022
[guojia] => World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => Transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery is proved to be a safe and effective method to treat postoperative pain (2B); a rectus sheath block is a viable alternative to the TAP block. (2B)
[laiyuan] => 腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞用于腹腔镜腹部手术患者被证实是一种安全有效的术后疼痛治疗方法;(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)腹直肌鞘阻滞是TAP阻滞的可行替代方案。(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)
[znzldj] => A
[_inputtime] => 1704957258
[_updatetime] => 1704957258
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞用于腹腔镜腹部手术患者被证实是一种安全有效的术后疼痛治疗方法;(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)腹直肌鞘阻滞是TAP阻滞的可行替代方案。(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)
Transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery is proved to be a safe and effective method to treat postoperative pain (2B); a rectus sheath block is a viable alternative to the TAP block. (2B)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:A
年份:2022
国家:World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global
Array
(
[id] => 929
[catid] => 35
[title] => Postoperative pain management in non-traumatic emergency general surgery: WSES-GAIS-SIAARTI-AAST guidelines
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/929.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:18
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:18
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2022
[guojia] => World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => Local wound infusion is suggested as a component of multimodal analgesia. (2B)
[laiyuan] => 建议将局部伤口浸润作为多模式镇痛的一个组成部分。(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)
[znzldj] => A
[_inputtime] => 1704957258
[_updatetime] => 1704957258
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
建议将局部伤口浸润作为多模式镇痛的一个组成部分。(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)
Local wound infusion is suggested as a component of multimodal analgesia. (2B)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:A
年份:2022
国家:World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global
Array
(
[id] => 930
[catid] => 35
[title] => Postoperative pain management in non-traumatic emergency general surgery: WSES-GAIS-SIAARTI-AAST guidelines
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/930.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:18
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:18
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2022
[guojia] => World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => The use of continuous local wound infusion catheters is associated with a significant decrease in visual analogue scores for pain at rest and with activity. (2B)
[laiyuan] => 伤口导管持续输注局麻药的使用与静息和活动时疼痛的视觉模拟评分显著降低相关。(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)
[znzldj] => A
[_inputtime] => 1704957258
[_updatetime] => 1704957258
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
伤口导管持续输注局麻药的使用与静息和活动时疼痛的视觉模拟评分显著降低相关。(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)
The use of continuous local wound infusion catheters is associated with a significant decrease in visual analogue scores for pain at rest and with activity. (2B)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:A
年份:2022
国家:World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global
Array
(
[id] => 931
[catid] => 35
[title] => Postoperative pain management in non-traumatic emergency general surgery: WSES-GAIS-SIAARTI-AAST guidelines
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/931.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:18
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:18
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2022
[guojia] => World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => Use of continuous local wound infusion catheters consistently reduces the need for opioids, both as rescue and total dose. (2B)
[laiyuan] => 伤口导管持续输注局麻药的使用持续降低了阿片类药物的需求,包括追加和总剂量。(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)
[znzldj] => A
[_inputtime] => 1704957258
[_updatetime] => 1704957258
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
伤口导管持续输注局麻药的使用持续降低了阿片类药物的需求,包括追加和总剂量。(证据质量:中;推荐强度:弱推荐)
Use of continuous local wound infusion catheters consistently reduces the need for opioids, both as rescue and total dose. (2B)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:A
年份:2022
国家:World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Global
Array
(
[id] => 896
[catid] => 303
[title] => Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition)
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/896.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2018
[guojia] => American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => In patients with INR of greater than 1.5 but less than 3, the increase in risk with progressive INR prolongation remains unknown. We suggest indwelling catheters may be maintained with caution, based on INR and duration of warfarin therapy. (2C)
[laiyuan] => 对于1.5<INR<3的患者,随着INR值持续延长所增加的风险仍然未知。建议根据 INR 和华法林治疗的持续时间,谨慎保留留置导管。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:弱推荐)
[znzldj] => B
[_inputtime] => 1704957257
[_updatetime] => 1704957257
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
对于1.5<INR<3的患者,随着INR值持续延长所增加的风险仍然未知。建议根据 INR 和华法林治疗的持续时间,谨慎保留留置导管。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:弱推荐)
In patients with INR of greater than 1.5 but less than 3, the increase in risk with progressive INR prolongation remains unknown. We suggest indwelling catheters may be maintained with caution, based on INR and duration of warfarin therapy. (2C)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:B
年份:2018
国家:American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
Array
(
[id] => 897
[catid] => 303
[title] => Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition)
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/897.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2018
[guojia] => American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => Neurologic testing of sensory and motor function should be performed routinely during epidural analgesia for patients on warfarin therapy. To facilitate neurologic evaluation, we recommend that the type of analgesic solution be tailored to minimize the degree of sensory and motor blockade. (1C)
[laiyuan] => 对接受华法林治疗的患者进行硬膜外镇痛时,应常规进行感觉和运动功能的神经学检测。建议根据患者的具体情况选择镇痛溶液的类型,最大限度地降低感觉和运动阻滞程度,以便于进行神经系统评估。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:强推荐)
[znzldj] => B
[_inputtime] => 1704957257
[_updatetime] => 1704957257
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
对接受华法林治疗的患者进行硬膜外镇痛时,应常规进行感觉和运动功能的神经学检测。建议根据患者的具体情况选择镇痛溶液的类型,最大限度地降低感觉和运动阻滞程度,以便于进行神经系统评估。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:强推荐)
Neurologic testing of sensory and motor function should be performed routinely during epidural analgesia for patients on warfarin therapy. To facilitate neurologic evaluation, we recommend that the type of analgesic solution be tailored to minimize the degree of sensory and motor blockade. (1C)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:B
年份:2018
国家:American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
Array
(
[id] => 898
[catid] => 303
[title] => Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition)
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/898.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2018
[guojia] => American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => For patients undergoing perineuraxial, deep plexus, or deep peripheral block, we recommend that guidelines regarding neuraxial techniques be similarly applied. (1C)
[laiyuan] => 对于接受会阴神经、深部神经丛或深部外周阻滞的患者,同样建议应用有关神经阻滞技术的指南。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:强推荐)
[znzldj] => B
[_inputtime] => 1704957257
[_updatetime] => 1704957257
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
对于接受会阴神经、深部神经丛或深部外周阻滞的患者,同样建议应用有关神经阻滞技术的指南。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:强推荐)
For patients undergoing perineuraxial, deep plexus, or deep peripheral block, we recommend that guidelines regarding neuraxial techniques be similarly applied. (1C)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:B
年份:2018
国家:American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
Array
(
[id] => 899
[catid] => 303
[title] => Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition)
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/899.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2018
[guojia] => American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => For patients undergoing other plexus or peripheral techniques, we suggest management (performance, catheter maintenance, and catheter removal) based on site compressibility, vascularity, and consequences of bleeding, should it occur. (2C)
[laiyuan] => 对于接受其他神经丛或外周技术治疗的患者,建议根据治疗部位的可压缩性、血管情况以及一旦发生出血的后果来进行管理(表现、导管维护和导管移除)。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:弱推荐)
[znzldj] => B
[_inputtime] => 1704957257
[_updatetime] => 1704957257
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
对于接受其他神经丛或外周技术治疗的患者,建议根据治疗部位的可压缩性、血管情况以及一旦发生出血的后果来进行管理(表现、导管维护和导管移除)。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:弱推荐)
For patients undergoing other plexus or peripheral techniques, we suggest management (performance, catheter maintenance, and catheter removal) based on site compressibility, vascularity, and consequences of bleeding, should it occur. (2C)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:B
年份:2018
国家:American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
Array
(
[id] => 900
[catid] => 303
[title] => Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition)
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/900.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2018
[guojia] => American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => Given the limited pharmacologic data on antithrombotic agents in pregnancy and in the absence of a large series of neuraxial techniques in the pregnant population receiving prophylaxis or treatment for VTE, we suggest that the ASRA guidelines be applied to parturients. (2C)
[laiyuan] => 鉴于与妊娠期抗血栓药物药理学的相关数据有限,且缺乏大量神经阻滞技术针对妊娠人群的防治静脉血栓栓塞,建议将美国区域麻醉与疼痛医学学会指南应用于孕妇。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:弱推荐)
[znzldj] => B
[_inputtime] => 1704957257
[_updatetime] => 1704957257
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
鉴于与妊娠期抗血栓药物药理学的相关数据有限,且缺乏大量神经阻滞技术针对妊娠人群的防治静脉血栓栓塞,建议将美国区域麻醉与疼痛医学学会指南应用于孕妇。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:弱推荐)
Given the limited pharmacologic data on antithrombotic agents in pregnancy and in the absence of a large series of neuraxial techniques in the pregnant population receiving prophylaxis or treatment for VTE, we suggest that the ASRA guidelines be applied to parturients. (2C)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:B
年份:2018
国家:American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
Array
(
[id] => 901
[catid] => 303
[title] => Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition)
[thumb] =>
[keywords] =>
[description] =>
[hits] =>
[uid] => 1
[author] => 系统管理员
[status] => 9
[url] => https://www.anes-guide.com/show/901.html
[link_id] => 0
[tableid] => 0
[inputip] => 14.105.95.222
[inputtime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[updatetime] => 2024-01-11 15:14:17
[displayorder] => 0
[nrjc] => Array
(
)
[nrsh] => Array
(
)
[xzl] => 0
[dzl] => 0
[wailian] =>
[demo_url] =>
[zjpjff] => GRADE
[zjfj] =>
[tjqd] =>
[nianfen] => 2018
[guojia] => American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M
[pdf] =>
[tjyjyw] =>
[lyyw] => We suggest that neurologic assessment be continued for at least 24 hours folCing catheter removal. (2C)
[laiyuan] => 建议在移除导管后至少24小时继续进行神经系统的评估。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:弱推荐)
[znzldj] => B
[_inputtime] => 1704957257
[_updatetime] => 1704957257
[_nrjc] =>
[_nrsh] =>
)
推荐意见
建议在移除导管后至少24小时继续进行神经系统的评估。(证据质量:低;推荐强度:弱推荐)
We suggest that neurologic assessment be continued for at least 24 hours folCing catheter removal. (2C)
证据评价方法:GRADE
指南质量等级:B
年份:2018
国家:American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain M